In previous posts I have made clear that both leadership and character development are legitimate academic undertakings. I have also stated that the former has outpaced the latter, at least in terms of student participation, funding and breadth of publications
Notwithstanding this gap, I just received very magnanimous explanation of why the gap exists. Here follows an excerpt of that explanation from the Dean of one of the country’s elite leadership schools.
Character is harder, starts earlier. Leadership as I see it, comprises a set of skills that can be learned at most any time. Character is a (the?) critical attribute of a person’s underlying nature, which determines how one interacts with other people: morality, honor, thrift, honesty, reliability, etc. If you think leadership is hard, try fixing character…oh wait, you are! There have been many effective leaders of relatively low character, and high character people who were not effective leaders.
It is exactly this kind of commentary that I hope will develop leaders for the common good and stimulates a wider interdisciplinary dialogue between leadership and character scholars. Perhaps my character scholar friends at Tufts University, West Point and in corporate America might accept the challenge of supporting the mission of leadership development in teaching high character, effective leaders.